口岸地区登革热媒介监测方法的比较研究

    高思维1，周天喜1，李平航1，吴青1，邱元明1，林伟2

    1.福州出入境检验检疫局卫检处，福建 福州350015；2.福州出入境检验检疫局长乐办

    摘要：目的评价传统登革热媒介监测方法的优劣，探索适合口岸地区的登革热媒介监测和综合评价方法。方法2010年8—10月之间，随机选择福州口岸7个监测点，使用人工小时法、幼虫指数法、100ml计数法、集卵器法等实施登革热监测和风险评估。结果目前采用的监测方法在实际工作中存在种种不足，特别是做为登革热预防控制和流行强度预测判定指标的布雷图指数、容器指数和房屋指数，不太适合口岸生态环境，可能低估口岸登革热媒介流行强度。结论应加大对灭蚊磁场法、集卵器法等新型监测方法的使用力度，研究更加敏感特异的登革热监测方法。

    关键词：口岸；登革热；媒介监测；方法；比较

    中图分类号：R184.31　文献标识码：B

    Comparing study for methods in vectorsurveillance for

    Dengue fever at frontier port

    GAO Si-wei*, ZHOU Tian-xi, LI Ping-hang, WUQing, QIU Yuan-ming, LIN Wei

    Fuzhou Entry-exit Inspection and QuarantineBureau, Fuzhou, Fujian 350015, China

    Abstract:   Objective  To compare the conventional methods in vector surveillance forDengue fever in order to search for the best method and evaluatingindex at frontier port.   Methods   7 docks atFuzhou seaport randomly three months from Aug. 2010 to Oct. 2010for vector survey of Dengue fever were choszen. The traditionalmethods such as labor hour method and larva index and ovitrap andCounting of mosquito larvae in 100 ml of waterand haz ardevaluation of Dengue fever were choszen.  Results  The traditional methods have some disadvantages in vectorsurveillance for Dengue fever，especially the most important indexesin judgment and prevention and controlling of dengue fever such asBreteau index and housing index and container index are not suitfor surveillance at frontier port，they may underestimate theintensity of vectors at frontier port. Conclusion    We should enhance the study ofmosquito magnet pro trap and ovitrap，in order to search after thesensitive and differential methods of vector surveillance forDengue fever at frontier port.

    Key words:   Frontier port; Denguefever; Vector surveillance; Compare; Methods

    《中国国境卫生检疫杂志》